Recent Developments in Pathological Diagnosis and Classification of Lung Cancer Serpil Dizbay Sak Ankara ÜTF, Patoloji ABD 15. Toraks Kongresi Nisan 2012/Antalya
Conflict of Interest: NONE TO DECLARE
Topics “Old” classification Why do we need change? The new (proposed) classification
OLD CLASSIFICATION
TC Sağlık Bakanlığı
T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Kanserle Savaş Dairesi Yaşa spesifik insidans Erkek Kadın Kaba insidens hızı 74,85 10,68 Yaşa standardize insidens hızı (YSH) 75,80 9,58 Expected number of new cases in Turkey 30.239 Türkiye’nin Akciğer Kanseri Haritası Projesi Türk Toraks Derneği/ Akciğer ve Plevra Maligniteleri Çalışma Grubu T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Kanserle Savaş Dairesi
2004 Written by pathologists for pathologists Surgical resection specimens
Akciğerin malign epitelyal tümörleri (WHO 2004) İNVAZİV 1.Yassı hücreli karsinoma 2.Küçük hücreli karsinoma 3. Adenokarsinoma 4. Büyük hücreli karsinoma 5. Adenoskuamöz karsinoma 6. Sarkomatoid karsinoma 7. Karsinoid tümör 8.Tükrük bezi tipi karsinomalar PREKÜRSÖR-ÖNCÜ 9.Preinvaziv lezyonlar Displazi- CIS AAH DIPNECH
Adeno carcinoma(25-40%) ↑ SCC (25-40%) ↓ Small cell (20-25%) WHO 2004 Adeno carcinoma(25-40%) ↑ SCC (25-40%) ↓ Small cell (20-25%) Large cell (%10-25)
Akciğerin malign epitelyal tümörleri Mevcut Sınıflama (WHO2004) 4. Büyük hücreli karsinoma a. Büyük hücreli nöroendokrin karsinoma b.Bazoloid karsinoma c.Lenfoepitelyoma benzeri karsinoma d. Şeffaf (berrak) hücreli karsinoma g. Rabdoid fenotipli büyük hücreli karsinoma 5. Adenoskuamöz karsinoma 6. Sarkomatoid karsinomalar a. Pleomorfik karsinoma b. İğsi hücreli karsinoma c. Dev hücreli karsinoma b. Karsinosarkoma c. Pulmoner blastoma 7. Karsinoid tümör a.Tipik karsinoid b.Atipik karsinoid 8.Tükrük bezi tipi karsinomalar a. Mukoepidermoid karsinoma b. Adenoid kistik karsinoma c. Epitelyal-myoepitelyal 9.Preinvaziv l ezyonlar a.İn situ yassı hücreli karsinoma b.Atipik adenomatöz hiperplazi c. Diffüz idiyopatik pulmoner nöroendokrin hücre hiperplazisi 1.Yassı hücreli karsinoma a. Papiller b. Şeffaf (berrak) hücreli c. Küçük hücreli d. Bazaloid 2.Küçük hücreli karsinoma Kombine küçük hücreli karsinoma 3. Adenokarsinoma a. Asiner b. Papiller c. Bronkioloalveolar karsinoma: müsinöz/nonmüsinöz/mikst d. Müsin bulunduran solid e. Mikst adenokarsinoma Varyantlar: Fetal Müsinöz karsinom Müsinöz kistadeno karsinom Taşlı yüzük hücreli karsinom Berrak hücreli karsinom 3. Adenokarsinoma a. Asiner b. Papiller c. Bronkioloalveolar karsinoma: müsinöz/nonmüsinöz/mikst d. Müsin bulunduran solid e. Mikst adenokarsinoma
WHO 2004
WHO 2004
Adenokarsinoma a. Asiner b. Papiller c. Bronkioloalveolar karsinoma d. Müsin bulunduran solid adenokarsinoma e. Mikst adenokarsinoma %90 Mikst tipte (asiner, papiller ve BAK patterni bulunduran) adenokarsinoma
Stage of NSCLC by the time of diagnosis Number (%) IA 72 1.8 IB 336 8.3 IIA 21 0.5 IIB 234 5.8 IIIA 446 11.0 IIIB 1248 30.8 IV 1696 41.8 Total 4053 100.0 72.6 % Türkiye’nin Akciğer Kanseri Haritası Projesi Türk Toraks Derneği/ Akciğer ve Plevra Maligniteleri Çalışma Grubu T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Kanserle Savaş Dairesi
Only small biopsy and cytology specimens are available in advanced disease
Classification is difficult in small specimen Necrosis Artefacts Lack of differantiation Tumor heterogeneity
Non-small cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma SCC Large cell
Simple Reproducable Sufficient for patient management Chemo for small cell Surgery or cytotoxic therapy for NSCLC
CHANGE, WHY?
NEED FOR NEW PROGNOSTIC CATEGORIES Why Change? New and Targeted therapies Prognostic information on small BAC’s Molecular characterization of lung cancer New agents for adenocarcinoma Histologic eligibility criteria for some new drugs Excellent prognosis of pure BAC and BAC with minimal invasion DEMISE OF NSCLC NEED FOR NEW PROGNOSTIC CATEGORIES
NEED FOR NEW PROGNOSTIC CATEGORIES Why Change? New and Targeted therapies Prognostic information on small BAC’s Molecular characterization of lung cancer New agents for adenocarcinoma Histologic eligibility criteria for some new drugs Excellent prognosis of pure BAC and BAC with minimal invasion DEMISE OF NSCLC NEED FOR NEW PROGNOSTIC CATEGORIES
Normal akciğere bi daha bi görelim
Lung adenocarcinoma measuring 2 cm or less A Lokalized BAC Noguchi M, Morikawa A, Kawasaki M, et al. Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer. 1995;75:2844–2852. Lung adenocarcinoma measuring 2 cm or less A Lokalized BAC B Lokalized BAC-focal alveolar collapse C Lokalized BAC-focal aktve fibroblastic proliferation 4. D Poorly differentiated AC E Tubular adenocarcinoma F Papillary adenocarcinoma with compressive and destructive growth
LOH in tumor supressor genes: Noguchi A (BAC): 17% Aoyagi Y, Yokose T, Minami Y, et al. Accumulation of losses of heterozygosity and multistep carcinogenesis in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:7950–7954. LOH in tumor supressor genes: Noguchi A (BAC): 17% Noguchi B (BAK-focal alveolar collapse):40% Noguchi C (BAK-focal active fibroblastic proliferation): 96%
In-situ adenocarcinoma: BAC 0 % Koga T, Hashimoto S, Sugio K, et al. Clinicopathological and molecular evidence indicating the independence of bronchioloalveolar components from other subtypes of human peripheral lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1730–1738. P53 mutation In-situ adenocarcinoma: BAC 0 % Early invazive adenocarcinoma (Minimally invazive adenocarcinoma) : Mixt type adenocarcinoma with a major BAC component 11% Late adenocarcinoma: Other adenocarcinomas 48%
In-situ adenocarcinoma Early invazive adenocarcinoma (Minimally invazive adenocarcinoma) Late adenocarcinoma
NEED FOR NEW PROGNOSTIC CATEGORIES Why Change? New and Targeted therapies Prognostic information on small BAC’s Molecular characterization of lung cancer New agents for adenocarcinoma Histologic eligibility criteria for some new drugs Excellent prognosis of pure BAC and BAC with minimal invasion DEMISE OF NSCLC NEED FOR NEW PROGNOSTIC CATEGORIES
New Agents Agent Trade name Type Erlotinib Tarceva Adenocarcinoma Gefitinib Iressa Bevacizumab Avastin Non-squamous Pemetrexed Alimta Etkinlik Toksisite Etkinlik NSCLC is not enough now
NEW (PROPOSED) CLASSIFICATION
2011 Multidisciplinary approach Small specimens
WHAT İS NEW? ReSECTIONS
Strong Recommendations For nonmucinous adenocarcinomas previously classified as mixed subtype where the predominant subtype consists of the former nonmucinous BAC, the use of the term LPA and discontinuing the term “mixed” subtype In patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma, the addition of “micropapillary predominant adenocarcinoma” as a major histologic subtype due to its association with poor prognosis Discontinuing the use of the term “BAC” For small (3 cm), solitary adenocarcinomas with pure lepidic growth, the use of term “Adenocarcinoma in situ” For small (3 cm), solitary, adenocarcinomas with predominant lepidic growth and small foci of invasion measuring 0.5 cm, the use of a new concept: “Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma”
Other Recommendations For invasive adenocarcinomas, comprehensive histologic subtyping be used to assess histologic patterns semiquantitatively in 5% increments, choosing a single predominant pattern. Individual tumors be classified according to the predominant pattern In patients with multiple lung adenocarcinomas, comprehensive histologic subtyping in the comparison of the complex, heterogeneous mixtures of histologic patterns to determine whether the tumors are metastases or separate synchronous or metachronous primaries
WHO 2004
100 % DFS
Micropapillary Solid Lepidic Aciner Papillary
Micropapillary pattern: Poor prognosis
Örnek: İNVAZİV ADENOKARSİNOMA, ASİNER TİP BASKIN ( % 50 ASİNER, %25 PAPİLLER, %25 LEPİDİK TİP) İNVAZİV ADENOKARSİNOMA, MÜSİN OLUŞTURAN SOLİD TİP BASKIN ( % 70 MÜSİN OLUŞTURAN SOLİD , %30 ASİNER TİP) İNVAZİV ADENOKARSİNOMA, MİKROPAPİLLER TİP BASKIN ( % 80 MİKROPAPİLLER, % 15 PAPİLLER, %5 ASİNER TİP)
Limited (Sublobar) resections For a limited resection to be adequate: A precise intraoperative diagnosis Evaluation of resection margins Evaluation of lymph nodes FROZEN SECTIONS
TTF1 SPA CDX2 MUC5A A subset of AC morphologically and immunohistochemically resembling colonic carcinoma
WHAT IS NEW? SMALL BIOPSY
RECOMMENDATION For small biopsies and cytology, NSCLC be further classified into a more specific type, such as adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, whenever possible The term NSCLC-NOS be used as little as possible, only when a more specific diagnosis is not possible by morphology and/or special stains
Special Stains Adenocarcinoma Squamous Cocktails (nuclear/cytoplasmic) Mucin TTF1, Napsin, PE10 Squamous P63, CK5/6, 34BE12 Cocktails (nuclear/cytoplasmic) Adeno TTF1/napsin Squamous p63/ck5/6
Summary Classify by morphology if possible Squamous Adeno Define patterns
Summary If NSCL-NOS by H&E IHC Squamous markers +, adeno -: NSCL- favor squamous Squamous markers -, adeno +: NSCL- favor adeno If both negative, inconsistent NSCL-NOS
Morphology should be adequate for most cases IHC should be used if necessary Tissue must be used very carefully and saved for molecular studies
p63
NSCLC Favor adenocarcinoma TTF1
Molecular: When? Every case if it is adenocarcinoma; and when adenocarcinoma can not be ruled out safely: Adenocarcinoma NSCLC- favor adenocarcinoma NSCLC-NOS
Molecular: What? EGFR (mutation) EML4-ALK translocation (FISH) K-Ras (mutation)
Role of Pathology Differentiate cancer from non-cancer Differentiate viable tissue from non-viable tissue Differentiate adequate sample size from non- adequate sample size Tumor type Suggesting/performing the appropriate molecular test for the tumor type